What is the Difference Between Atheism and Agnosticism?

Facebooktwitterlinkedinrssyoutube

In the course of casual reading or conversation, you may be curious about the difference between atheism and agnosticism. These terms are often incorrectly conflated or treated as synonymous. In fact, they denote different worldviews or systems of understanding, and should not be confused. In the article that follows, these differences will be examined in greater detail, serving to educate the reader and clarify the concepts.

Agnosticism, a Method of Seeking

Many individuals who adhere to no particular theological practice or spiritual interpretation often self-identify as agnostic. If we break the word down at its most basic level, which comes from the Greek, we can better understand why this term is appropriate. A-, which means to be without or the opposite of, precedes the word for knowledge—gnosis. Therefor, to be agnostic is to be without knowledge.

Recommended: 20 Great Colleges for Atheists and Agnostics

Individuals who fall under this heading do not deny the existence of a deity or deities. They simply feel that they have not yet found an appropriate representation of that entity or grouping. In essence, they are open to spirituality and the structure of religious practice, but they are still seeking knowledge of the numinous. This questing nature and the concepts that spur individuals to continue seeking greater understanding are still religious, although they may have no communal or ritualized forms of expression.

Atheism Is Not Nihilism

The other term in our exploration, atheism, is often confused with nihilism. As the latter term denotes, nihilism is an absence of belief in anything. This is not at all what atheists embody. Using similar tools to understand the Greek roots of the term, a-, stands for the lack of or opposite to, and -theism represents the belief in a divine being or beings.

Based on this linguistic formation, atheists are simply individuals who deny the existence of a creator deity or deities. These individuals may pursue knowledge of the natural world through a number of channels, including the natural and hard sciences. They, like agnostics, are seekers of understanding. However, the difference between atheism and agnosticism resides in their very different base assumptions about the world.

Atheists may premise that everything is answerable through the use of scientific methods. While we may not yet have intellectual tools sufficient to grasp the finer mechanics of the physical universe, it does not entail the existence of a mysterious or supernatural creator. Many atheists maintain that numinous forms served as explanatory vehicles for human cultures prior to the formation of adequate theoretical and analytical frameworks.

It’s important to understand that while a majority of atheists make no provision for religious belief within a culture, anthropologists maintain that such systems perform a vital social function. They often see little conflict between the rigorous empiricism of science and the intangible mysticism of religious beliefs. One seeks to quantify and describe the physical universe. The other serves as a medium for social cohesion and the enforcement of group morality and power hierarchies.

While the terms may become tangled in the course of public debates, calm heads with sufficient understanding can prevail. To be an atheist is not a crime, unless one lives in a theocracy. With the same consideration, to seek evidence of a spiritual being to reinforce concepts we accept as rational or reasonable is not illegal or to be demeaned. The difference between atheism and agnosticism is one of original premise—the existence of the supernatural—and while they are both acceptable philosophies, they lead to very different conclusions.